Slackware Vs. Absolute Linux: The Original Linux Distro

Slackware Vs. Absolute Linux: The Original Linux Distro

Executive Summary

Slackware and Absolute Linux are two of the oldest and most respected Linux distributions available today. Both distros have a strong following and are known for their stability, security, and performance. However, there are also some key differences between the two distributions that make them better suited for different users.

Introduction

Slackware was first released in 1993, making it one of the first Linux distributions ever created. It is a text-based distribution that is known for its simplicity and adherence to the Unix philosophy. Absolute Linux was first released in 2024 and is a graphical distribution that is based on Slackware. It is known for its ease of use and its wide range of software packages.

Subtopics

Package Management

Both Slackware and Absolute Linux use the pacman package manager. This package manager is known for its simplicity and speed.

Slackware:

  • Slackware uses a rolling release model, which means that users always have access to the latest software updates.
  • Slackware’s package management system is very manual, which can be a challenge for new users.
  • Slackware has a large repository of software packages, but many of them are not maintained by the Slackware team.

Absolute Linux:

  • Absolute’s uses the “noarch” principle of package management, which allows users to install 32-bit packages on amd64 systems and vice versa.
  • Absolute Linux uses a more traditional release model, which means that users receive major updates less frequently.
  • Absolute Linux’s package management system is more user-friendly than Slackware’s.
  • Absolute Linux has a smaller repository of software packages, but they are all maintained by the Absolute Linux team.

Security

Both Slackware and Absolute Linux are known for their security. However, there are some key differences between the two distributions that make them more or less suitable for different users.

Slackware:

  • Slackware is a very secure distribution, but it can be difficult to configure properly.
  • Slackware does not have a built-in firewall or intrusion detection system.
  • Slackware is not as well-supported as some other Linux distributions, which can make it difficult to find help if you encounter security problems.

Absolute Linux:

  • Absolute Linux is also a very secure distribution, but it is easier to configure than Slackware.
  • Absolute Linux has a built-in firewall and intrusion detection system.
  • Absolute Linux is well-supported, which makes it easier to find help if you encounter security problems.

Stability

Both Slackware and Absolute Linux are known for their stability. However, there are some key differences between the two distributions that make them more or less stable for different users.
Slackware:

  • Slackware is a very stable distribution, but it can be difficult to keep up-to-date.
  • Slackware’s rolling release model means that users are constantly receiving updates, which can sometimes lead to stability problems.
  • Slackware’s package management system is very manual, which can lead to user errors that can cause stability problems.
    Absolute Linux:
  • Absolute Linux is also a very stable distribution, but it is easier to keep up-to-date than Slackware.
  • Absolute Linux’s traditional release model means that users receive major updates less frequently, which can reduce the risk of stability problems.
  • Absolute Linux’s package management system is more user-friendly than Slackware’s.

Performance

Both Slackware and Absolute Linux are known for their performance. However, there are some key differences between the two distributions that make them more or less suitable for different users.
Slackware:

  • Slackware is a very lightweight distribution, which makes it suitable for older computers or servers.
  • Slackware’s simple design can also make it faster than some other Linux distributions.
  • Slackware’s package management system can be slow, which can slow down the installation and updating of software.
    Absolute Linux:
  • Absolute Linux is also a lightweight distribution, but it is not as lightweight as Slackware.
  • Absolute Linux’s graphical interface can make it slower than Slackware in some situations.
  • Absolute Linux’s package management system is more efficient than Slackware’s.
  • Absolute Linux’s system abstraction layer can also lead to performance increases in some situations.

Ease of Use

Slackware and Absolute Linux are both relatively easy to use, but Absolute Linux is generally considered to be more user-friendly.
Slackware:

  • Slackware is a text-based distribution, which can be challenging for new users.
  • Slackware’s package management system is very manual, which can be difficult to use for new users.
  • Slackware has a large community of users who can provide support, but it can be difficult to find help for specific problems.
    Absolute Linux:
  • Absolute Linux is a graphical distribution, which is easier to use than a text-based distribution.
  • Absolute Linux’s package management system is more user-friendly than Slackware’s.
  • Absolute Linux has a smaller community of users than Slackware, but it is still easy to find help for specific problems.

Conclusion

Ultimately, the best Linux distribution for you will depend on your individual needs and preferences. If you are looking for a stable, secure, and lightweight distribution that is easy to use, then Slackware is a good option. If you are looking for a graphical distribution that is easier to use than Slackware and has a wider range of software packages, then Absolute Linux is a good option.

Keyword Phrase Tags

  • Slackware
  • Absolute Linux
  • Linux distribution
  • Package management
  • Security
  • Stability
  • Performance
  • Ease of use
Share this article
Shareable URL
Prev Post

Fedora Design Suite Vs. Ubuntu Studio: Creatives Compared

Next Post

Gobolinux Vs. Nixos: Innovative File Systems

Comments 14
  1. Slackware’s commitment to follow Linux kernel versions and use in-house package management is a respectable decision, while I like the roll-release system in Absolute Linux.

  2. Stability and purity, those are the kings of Slackware. I’ve been using it for ages and will not change until they kick me out.

  3. I’m not sure if the popularity Slackware charts are reflecting the Slackware total user base. I work with a lot of folks who love the distro but don’t go around broadcasting it.

  4. Sure, no-nonsense, and stability are nice. But without the latest packages and a working community, there’s no future.

  5. You always have a choice. You can use Slackware for that professional stability, or you can use Ubuntu for ease and support. Each one has its pros and cons.

  6. Why not use Arch Linux, LFS, or Gentoo if what you really want is total control? At least those have a larger community and more up-to-date packages.

Dodaj komentarz

Twój adres e-mail nie zostanie opublikowany. Wymagane pola są oznaczone *

Read next