Manjaro vs. PCLinuxOS: User-friendly Linux Distributions Compared
Manjaro and PCLinuxOS are two user-friendly Linux distributions designed to provide a seamless experience for beginners and experienced users alike. However, there are some key differences between the two that may influence your choice:
Software Sources and Package Management:
- Manjaro: Uses Arch-based repositories, offering a rolling-release model with access to the latest software updates promptly. However, this may also bring instability on some occasions.
- PCLinuxOS: Relies on its community-curated repositories, maintaining a more stable environment with fewer potential issues but can be slower in providing the latest updates.
User Interface and Aesthetics:
- Manjaro: Features the KDE Plasma desktop environment as its default, known for its customization options and user-friendly design.
- PCLinuxOS: Utilizes a heavily customized LXQt/LXDE desktop environment, offering a lightweight and minimalist interface that consumes fewer system resources.
Hardware Compatibility:
- Manjaro: Generally good hardware compatibility, as it follows the Arch Linux philosophy of supporting a wide range of devices.
- PCLinuxOS: Known for its excellent hardware support, particularly for older or less-common hardware components, thanks to its extensive repository of drivers and optimized kernel.
Community and Support:
- Manjaro: Backed by a vibrant community of volunteers and developers, offering comprehensive documentation and active online forums for support.
- PCLinuxOS: Supported by a dedicated team of developers and contributors, providing reliable updates, documentation, and user-focused support through its forums and mailing lists.
Suitability:
- Manjaro: Best suited for users seeking a rolling-release distro with access to the most up-to-date software and who are comfortable with potentially encountering stability issues.
- PCLinuxOS: Ideal for users prioritizing a stable and dependable system, particularly those with older or uncommon hardware devices and who prefer a less resource-intensive interface.
It is good that it finally introduces beginner freindly Linux distributions.
I don’t think this looks user-friendly at all. The article uses too much unexplainable technical jargon.
Arch-based Manjaro is famous for having frequently updates. You can have the latest drivers and libraries.
The conclusion doesn’t make sense. I think it is saying 2 different distros are similar to each other and then says they are for different user groups.
So, it is basically a comparison between Arch and Debian. Who would have thought.
They have tried to show the evident feature gaps by this article. But it is unclear if they are talking good or bad.
PC Linux OS can’t be recommended for beginners. Also Manjaro is not for experienced users. This review is misleading.
i am not sure whether i shold go4manjaro or pclinuxos. it seem like both distros are good. more infomation needed.
Pclinuxos is good for home and Manjaro is for office works who want latest technology.
This did not prove anypoint.
This is simply a view of the surface features.
Absolutly trash comparison! I’d rather use FreeBSD than any of these immature Linux distros.
The information in the article could be even more accurate if the author cited their information.