Manjaro vs. Garuda: Which Arch-Based Distro Wins?
When it comes to choosing an Arch-based Linux distribution, two popular options are Manjaro and Garuda. Both distros are known for their user-friendliness, bleeding-edge software, and extensive customization options. But which one is the better choice for you?
1. User Friendliness
Manjaro has a reputation for being more user-friendly than Garuda. It offers a graphical installer, simplified package management, and a user-friendly desktop environment (KDE Plasma, GNOME, or XFCE). Garuda, on the other hand, is known for its advanced features and powerful customization options, which can be overwhelming for new users.
2. Software and Updates
Both Manjaro and Garuda provide access to the latest Arch software repositories. However, Manjaro maintains its own stable branch that receives regular updates, while Garuda follows a rolling-release model, which gives users access to the latest software versions but may also introduce more instability.
3. Customization
Garuda offers a wider range of customization options than Manjaro, including multiple desktop environments, kernels, and pre-configured profiles for different use cases (gaming, multimedia, security, etc.). Manjaro, while still customizable, has a more limited set of pre-configured options.
4. Performance
Both Manjaro and Garuda are known for their speed and efficiency. However, Garuda’s minimal approach, powerful kernel options, and emphasis on gaming performance may give it an edge in certain scenarios.
5. Community and Support
Both Manjaro and Garuda have active communities and forums where users can seek help and support. However, Manjaro has a larger and more established community, which may provide more resources and a wider range of expertise.
Conclusion
Ultimately, the best choice between Manjaro and Garuda depends on your individual needs and preferences. If you’re looking for a user-friendly Arch-based distro with a focus on stability and ease of use, Manjaro is a solid choice. If you’re a more advanced user seeking extensive customization options, bleeding-edge performance, and a minimalist approach, Garuda might be a better fit.
Actually this was a very good content for me. It really help to make me get the differences between these two great distros. However, it could be more better if there was a detailed comparison of the technical specifications for each software.
This is the best article I’ve ever seen about this subject. I really have no complaint at all. Thank you so much for making this. You’re an artist and you should be proud of that.
It is really a huge article. Thank you for that. However, I prefer and use Endeavour OS instead of the two that you are talking about in this article. How will you compare this distro to the others.
In my own opinion, I think that the best Arch-based distro is actually Artix Linux. I’ve been using it for years and I’ve never had any problems with it. It’s fast, stable, and lightweight. I would definitely recommend it to anyone who is looking for a good Arch-based distro.
This is like some history in a museum. I was expecting a nice article but this is like some kind of technology from decades already. The content is only good for those who love retro computing.
Old info. New is on their subreddits or forums.
Let me ask some kids if they know about this as history in our Informatics course in our college.
How about the AUR of both distros. How can you compare them in terms of its availability packages and updates.