Manjaro and EndeavourOS are two popular Arch-based Linux distributions tailored for different user needs. Manjaro focuses on user-friendliness and stability, while EndeavourOS emphasizes customizability and low-level control over the system.
User-Friendliness: Manjaro’s installation process is straightforward and beginner-friendly, featuring a graphical installer with preconfigured options. EndeavourOS, on the other hand, requires a manual installation process, suitable for experienced users who prefer to customize the system from scratch.
Software Availability: Manjaro has a curated software repository called the “Manjaro Unstable Repository” (AUR), which offers a wide range of packages not available in the Arch User Repository (AUR). EndeavourOS relies primarily on the AUR for additional software, providing access to a broader selection of packages but potentially introducing more risks due to the lack of quality control.
Stability: Manjaro’s rolling release model with regular testing phases enhances stability. EndeavorOS offers a choice between a rolling and stable release model, allowing users to prioritize stability or access to the latest software.
System Management: Manjaro ships with its own package manager called “pamac,” providing a user-friendly graphical interface for installing, updating, and removing software. EndeavourOS uses the traditional Arch Linux package management system, pacman, offering more advanced options and direct access to the AUR.
Target Audience: Manjaro is an excellent choice for users who value ease of use, reliability, and a diverse software ecosystem. EndeavorOS appeals to experienced users who enjoy the flexibility of Arch Linux combined with a graphical installer and some out-of-the-box customizations.
Ultimately, the choice between Manjaro and EndeavourOS depends on individual preferences and technical expertise. Both distributions offer unique strengths and can meet the needs of different types of Arch users.
I’m really excited to try out EndeavourOS. I’ve heard great things about it, and I’m eager to see how it compares to Manjaro.
I’ve used both Manjaro and EndeavourOS, and I have to say that I prefer Manjaro. I find it more stable and user-friendly.
EndeavourOS is a great choice for users who want a more hands-on experience with their operating system. It’s more customizable than Manjaro, and it gives users more control over their system.
I disagree with the article’s conclusion that EndeavourOS is the better choice for experienced users. I think that Manjaro is a better option for both beginners and experienced users alike.
I love how the article says that EndeavourOS is ‘perfect for users who want a minimalist experience’. I mean, it’s based on Arch Linux, which is known for being anything but minimalist.
Oh, so Manjaro is the ‘more user-friendly’ option, is it? Tell that to the countless users who have had problems with its updates.
I’m not sure why anyone would choose EndeavourOS over Manjaro. It’s like choosing a unicycle over a bicycle.
I’ve used both Manjaro and EndeavourOS, and I think they’re both great distros. It really depends on what you’re looking for in an operating system.
I’m new to Linux, and I’m really impressed with EndeavourOS. It’s easy to use, and it has a great community.