Manjaro Vs. Endeavouros: A Friendly Arch Battle
Executive Summary
Manjaro and EndeavourOS are two popular Arch-based Linux distributions that have gained significant traction in recent times. Both distributions cater to different user preferences, with Manjaro offering a more user-friendly and stable experience, while EndeavourOS provides a more customizable and bleeding-edge approach. This comparison aims to shed light on the key differences between these two distributions, helping users make an informed decision based on their specific needs and preferences.
Introduction
Arch-based Linux distributions are known for their simplicity, flexibility, and rolling release model, which ensures that users always have access to the latest software updates. Among the Arch-based distributions, Manjaro and EndeavourOS have emerged as prominent choices, offering different takes on the Arch experience. In this article, we will delve into the specific characteristics of each distribution, comparing them across various aspects to help users determine the one that best aligns with their requirements.
User-Friendliness
Manjaro: Manjaro prides itself on being user-friendly, making it a suitable choice for both beginners and experienced Linux users. It comes with a graphical installer, preconfigured settings, and a user-friendly desktop environment that simplifies the installation and setup process. Manjaro also provides extensive documentation, tutorials, and a helpful community that offers support to new users.
EndeavourOS: EndeavorOS takes a different approach to user-friendliness. It focuses on providing a more vanilla Arch experience, which means it requires more manual configuration and user intervention. This can be daunting for beginners but can also be appealing to experienced users who prefer greater control over their systems.
Rolling Release Model
Manjaro: As an Arch-based distribution, Manjaro follows the rolling release model, meaning that users receive continuous software updates. This ensures that users always have access to the latest features and security fixes. Manjaro takes a conservative approach to rolling releases, rigorously testing updates before pushing them to users to maintain stability.
EndeavourOS: EndeavourOS also adheres to the rolling release model, providing users with ongoing access to the latest software. However, unlike Manjaro, EndeavorOS strives to stay as close as possible to the upstream Arch repositories, offering a more bleeding-edge experience. This can come with a slightly higher risk of encountering occasional software issues.
Package Management
Manjaro: Manjaro uses the Pacman package manager, the same as Arch Linux. However, Manjaro maintains its own repositories, which may differ slightly from the Arch repositories in terms of package versions and stability. This allows Manjaro to provide a curated collection of packages that are optimized for stability and usability.
EndeavourOS: EndeavourOS uses the Pacman package manager and directly accesses the Arch Linux repositories, giving users access to the vast array of packages available in the Arch ecosystem. This allows EndeavourOS users to install virtually any software available for Arch Linux, providing maximum flexibility and customization options.
Customization
Manjaro: Manjaro provides a reasonably high level of customization options. Users can choose from various desktop environments, install additional software from the Manjaro repositories, and configure system settings to suit their preferences. However, compared to EndeavourOS, Manjaro’s focus on stability may limit certain customization options that could potentially destabilize the system.
EndeavourOS: EndeavourOS excels in customization, giving users the freedom to mold their systems to their liking. It comes with a minimal set of preinstalled software, allowing users to handpick and install only the components they need. EndeavourOS also provides various tools and scripts to facilitate advanced system customization, appealing to experienced users who seek complete control over their systems.
Community and Support
Manjaro: Manjaro boasts a vibrant community of users and contributors who provide support and resources to fellow users. Manjaro’s official forums, online documentation, and social media channels serve as valuable platforms for troubleshooting, sharing knowledge, and connecting with other Manjaro users.
EndeavourOS: EndeavourOS also has an active community, albeit smaller than Manjaro’s. The EndeavourOS forum, Discord server, and wiki are frequented by experienced users and developers who offer assistance to newcomers and engage in technical discussions. However, due to its focus on self-reliance, EndeavourOS may require users to be more proactive in seeking support when needed.
Conclusion
Manjaro and EndeavourOS offer distinct experiences within the realm of Arch-based Linux distributions. Manjaro strikes a balance between user-friendliness, stability, and customization, making it a suitable choice for both beginners and experienced users who prioritize ease of use and stability. On the other hand, EndeavourOS caters more towards experienced users who seek a more vanilla Arch experience, with a focus on customization and bleeding-edge software. By carefully considering the features, philosophies, and target audiences of each distribution, users can make an informed decision about which one aligns best with their individual needs and preferences.
Keyword Phrase Tags
- Arch-based Linux distributions
- Manjaro
- EndeavourOS
- Rolling release model
- User-friendliness
- Customization
I’ve been using Manjaro for over a year now and I’ve been very happy with it. It’s stable, reliable, and easy to use. I would definitely recommend it to anyone looking for an Arch-based distro.
I tried EndeavourOS for a while but I didn’t like it. It was too unstable and I had a lot of problems with it. I would not recommend it to anyone.
Manjaro and EndeavourOS are both great distros. It really depends on what you’re looking for. If you want something that’s easy to use and has a lot of support, then Manjaro is a good choice. If you want something that’s more lightweight and customizable, then EndeavourOS is a good choice.
I think EndeavourOS is better than Manjaro because it’s more lightweight and customizable. Manjaro is too bloated and it has too many unnecessary features.
I’m not sure why anyone would use Manjaro. It’s just a glorified Ubuntu with a rolling release model.
Wow, great article. I’m so glad I learned about the difference between Manjaro and EndeavourOS. Now I can finally make an informed decision about which one to use.
I’m not a big fan of either Manjaro or EndeavourOS. I prefer Arch Linux because it’s the most customizable and lightweight distro out there.
I think it’s important to remember that there is no one-size-fits-all solution when it comes to choosing a Linux distro. The best distro for you depends on your individual needs and preferences.
I’m a huge fan of EndeavourOS. It’s the most user-friendly Arch-based distro out there. I would recommend it to anyone who is looking for a stable and reliable distro.
I’m not sure I agree with your assessment of Manjaro. I’ve found it to be quite stable and reliable.
I think your article is biased towards Manjaro. You don’t give EndeavourOS enough credit.
I would also recommend checking out ArcoLinux. It’s another great Arch-based distro that is worth considering.
I’m new to Linux and I’m not sure which distro to choose. Can you give me some advice?
I would recommend starting with Manjaro. It’s a very user-friendly distro that is perfect for beginners.