Fedora Iot Vs. Ubuntu Core: Iot Editions Compared

Fedora IoT Vs. Ubuntu Core: IoT Editions Compared


Executive Summary


Fedora IoT and Ubuntu Core are two popular IoT operating systems that offer a variety of features and benefits. While both systems are designed for embedded and edge devices, they have different strengths and weaknesses. This comparison will help you understand the key differences between Fedora IoT and Ubuntu Core so that you can make the best decision for your next IoT project.



The Internet of Things (IoT) is a rapidly growing network of physical devices that are connected to the internet and can collect and exchange data. These devices range from simple sensors to complex machines, and they are used in a wide variety of applications, including home automation, industrial automation, and healthcare.

As the IoT continues to grow, there is a growing need for operating systems that are specifically designed for embedded and edge devices. These devices have unique requirements, such as low power consumption, small footprint, and high reliability. Fedora IoT and Ubuntu Core are two popular operating systems that meet these requirements.

Key Differences

1. Package Management

  • Fedora IoT uses RPM packages, while Ubuntu Core uses Snaps.
  • RPMs are a traditional package management system that has been used for many years. They are widely supported and there are a large number of RPM packages available.
  • Snaps are a newer package management system that is designed for IoT devices. They are more secure than RPMs and they can be updated atomically.

2. Security

  • Fedora IoT and Ubuntu Core both have a strong focus on security. They both use a layered security approach that includes features such as SELinux, AppArmor, and secure boot.
  • Fedora IoT is certified to Common Criteria EAL4+, which is a high level of security certification. Ubuntu Core is certified to Common Criteria EAL3+.

3. Ecosystem

  • Fedora IoT has a larger ecosystem than Ubuntu Core. This means that there are more software packages and tools available for Fedora IoT.
  • Ubuntu Core has a smaller ecosystem, but it is growing rapidly. There are a number of popular IoT platforms that support Ubuntu Core, such as AWS Greengrass and Microsoft Azure IoT Edge.

4. Support

  • Fedora IoT is supported by the Fedora Project, which is a community-driven project. This means that there is a large community of users and developers who can provide support.
  • Ubuntu Core is supported by Canonical, which is a commercial company. This means that there is professional support available, but it may come at a cost.

5. Price

  • Fedora IoT is free and open source.
  • Ubuntu Core is free for hobbyists and developers. There are also paid subscription options for businesses that need enterprise-level support.


Fedora IoT and Ubuntu Core are both excellent operating systems for IoT devices. They both have a strong focus on security, performance, and reliability. However, there are some key differences between the two systems. Fedora IoT has a larger ecosystem and is free and open source. Ubuntu Core has a smaller ecosystem but is supported by a commercial company. Ultimately, the best operating system for your IoT project will depend on your specific requirements.

Share this article
Shareable URL
Prev Post

Debian Vs. Ubuntu Server: The Best Server Distro

Next Post

Arch Linux Vs. Artix Linux: Systemd Vs. Runit Showdown

Comments 10
  1. This is a very good summary of the two most popular IoT operating systems. I would add that Ubuntu Core has a slightly larger community than Fedora IoT, but Fedora IoT is more popular in the enterprise space.

  2. I’m not sure I agree with your assessment. I’ve used both Fedora IoT and Ubuntu Core, and I found Ubuntu Core to be much easier to use.

  3. I found this article to be very helpful. I’m new to the world of IoT, and this article gave me a good overview of the two most popular operating systems.

  4. I think you’re oversimplifying the issue. There are a lot of factors to consider when choosing an IoT operating system, and it’s not always clear which one is better.

  5. I’m so excited about the future of IoT. I can’t wait to see what new developments come out in the next few years.

Dodaj komentarz

Twój adres e-mail nie zostanie opublikowany. Wymagane pola są oznaczone *

Read next