Debian Vs. Devuan: Systemd Vs. Sysvinit

Debian Vs. Devuan: Systemd Vs. Sysvinit


Executive Summary


Debian and Devuan are two popular Linux distributions that were once part of the same family. However, in 2024, a disagreement over the adoption of systemd led to the creation of Devuan, a fork of Debian that continues to use the traditional SysVinit init system. This article will compare and contrast Debian and Devuan, with a particular focus on the differences between systemd and SysVinit.



Debian is one of the oldest and most respected Linux distributions. It is known for its stability, security, and wide range of software packages. Devuan is a newer distribution that was created in 2024 as a fork of Debian. Devuan’s goal is to provide a stable and secure Linux distribution that uses SysVinit instead of systemd.

Systemd Vs. SysVinit

The main difference between Debian and Devuan is the init system that they use. Debian uses systemd, while Devuan uses SysVinit. Systemd is a newer init system that is designed to be more efficient and faster than SysVinit. However, it is also more complex and has been criticized for being less secure. SysVinit is an older init system that is simpler and more traditional. It is not as efficient as systemd, but it is more secure and easier to troubleshoot.

Advantages of Systemd

  • Faster boot times: systemd is designed to be more efficient than SysVinit, which results in faster boot times.
  • More flexible: systemd provides more flexibility than SysVinit, allowing users to customize the boot process and manage services more easily.
  • More secure: systemd includes a number of security features that are not present in SysVinit, such as sandboxing and privilege separation.

Advantages of SysVinit

  • Simpler: SysVinit is a simpler init system than systemd, making it easier to understand and troubleshoot.
  • More stable: SysVinit has been around for longer than systemd, and it is more stable and reliable.
  • More secure: SysVinit is a more secure init system than systemd, as it has a smaller attack surface and is less likely to be exploited.

Other Differences Between Debian and Devuan

In addition to the init system, there are a few other differences between Debian and Devuan.

Package Management

Debian uses the APT package management system, while Devuan uses the dpkg package management system. APT is a more user-friendly package management system than dpkg, and it provides a wider range of software packages. However, dpkg is a more traditional package management system, and it is more lightweight and efficient.


Debian has a larger number of repositories than Devuan. This means that Debian users have access to a wider range of software packages. However, Devuan’s repositories are more focused on stability and security, and they contain fewer experimental or unstable packages.

Community Support

Debian has a larger community than Devuan. This means that Debian users have access to more support and documentation. However, Devuan’s community is more passionate and dedicated, and they are more likely to help users with problems.


Debian and Devuan are both excellent Linux distributions. Debian is a more mature and stable distribution, while Devuan is a more focused and secure distribution. The choice between Debian and Devuan ultimately depends on your individual needs and preferences. If you are looking for a stable and secure distribution with a wide range of software packages, then Debian is a good choice. If you are looking for a distribution that is focused on privacy and security, then Devuan is a good choice.

Keyword Phrase Tags

  • Debian
  • Devuan
  • Systemd
  • SysVinit
  • Linux
Share this article
Shareable URL
Prev Post

Ubuntu Mate Vs. Mint Mate: Mate Desktop Environment Face-off

Next Post

Fedora Kde Vs. Neon: Cutting Edge Vs. Kde Focus

Comments 15
Dodaj komentarz

Twój adres e-mail nie zostanie opublikowany. Wymagane pola są oznaczone *

Read next