Archbang Vs. Bunsenlabs: Lightweight Openbox Distros

Archbang vs. Bunsenlabs: Lightweight Openbox Distros

Archbang and Bunsenlabs are two lightweight Linux distributions that use the Openbox window manager. To understand what distro is more users will need to review the similarities between the two distros and their unique differences. 


  • Lightweight: Both Archbang and Bunsenlabs are lightweight distros that are suitable for older computers or those with limited resources.
  • Openbox: Both distros also offer a minimalistic and lightweight interface through the use of the minimalist window manager, Openbox.
  • Rolling release: These distros have a rolling release model, which means that they are constantly updated with the latest software. Rolling releases receive updates every other week. 


  • Base: Archbang is based on Arch Linux, while Bunsenlabs is based on Debian. Arch Linux is a more bleeding-edge distro because it focuses on receiving the most up-to-date software packages, sometimes before their stability is confirmed. Debian while isn’t as cutting edge as Arch Linux, it tends to release more stable, tested software. Debian moves at a more conservative pace and issues security patches more frequently than Arch Linux. 
  • Package Management: As mentioned earlier, Arch Linux uses a rolling release. These updates are parceled out by the Arch User Repository (AUR), which hosts thousands of programs that include: command programs, full applications, and desktop environments. Debian packages their software into .deb packages and are managed by APT.
  • User Interface: Archbang uses a custom GTK theme, while Bunsenlabs uses a more traditional Openbox theme. Archbang has a very minimal user interface, while Bunsenlabs has a more traditional desktop environment with a panel and menu.  


Both Archbang and Bunsenlabs are lightweight and fast distros that are suitable for older computers or those with limited resources. Archbang is a good choice for users who want a more bleeding-edge distro, Bunsenlabs is more suited for users who want a distro that is stable and reliable. Ultimately, the best distro for you will depend on your specific needs and preferences.## Archbang Vs. Bunsenlabs: Lightweight Openbox Distros

Executive Summary

Archbang and Bunsenlabs are two minimalist Linux distributions that prioritize speed and efficiency over aesthetics. They provide a lean and uncluttered computing experience that is ideal for older hardware or users seeking simplicity and performance. This article explores the key differences between Archbang and Bunsenlabs, examining their package management, desktop environments, customization options, and overall strengths and weaknesses. By comparing these two lightweight Openbox distros, users can make an informed decision to choose the distro that best suits their specific needs.


In the vast landscape of Linux distributions, Archbang and Bunsenlabs stand out as prime examples of lightweight and efficient operating systems. Designed with Openbox as their window manager, these distros prioritize speed, responsiveness, and minimal resource usage. Whether you’re a seasoned Linux user seeking a no-nonsense distro or a novice seeking a beginner-friendly entry point, Archbang and Bunsenlabs offer compelling options. However, understanding the key differences between these two distros is essential for making the right choice.

Archbang: Rolling Release with KISS Philosophy

Package Management:

  • Archbang utilizes the Arch User Repository (AUR), a vast collection of user-submitted packages.
  • Rolling release model ensures access to the latest software versions but may introduce instability.
  • Pacman package manager provides a simple and efficient way to install and manage software.

Desktop Environment:

  • Openbox window manager offers a highly customizable and lightweight desktop experience.
  • Tint2 panel provides quick access to applications and system settings.
  • Conky system monitor displays essential system information at a glance.


  • Archbang encourages users to tailor their systems to their preferences.
  • Extensive documentation and community support facilitate customization and troubleshooting.

Bunsenlabs: Debian-Based Stability with Elegance

Package Management:

  • Bunsenlabs is based on Debian’s stable branch, offering a more conservative approach to package updates.
  • Apt package manager provides a reliable and user-friendly installation and management system.
  • Backports repository allows access to newer software packages while maintaining stability.

Desktop Environment:

  • Openbox window manager ensures a fast and responsive desktop environment.
  • BunsenLabs Panel offers a customizable and functional system panel.
  • Desktop themes and color schemes provide aesthetic options without compromising performance.


  • Bunsenlabs strikes a balance between simplicity and customization.
  • Pre-configured settings and a curated package selection simplify the out-of-the-box experience.
  • Users can still tweak settings and install additional packages to personalize their systems.

Strengths and Weaknesses


  • Strengths: Rolling release ensures access to the latest software versions, highly customizable, active community support.
  • Weaknesses: Potential instability due to the rolling release model, limited pre-configured settings, requires more user configuration.


  • Strengths: Debian-based stability, curated package selection, user-friendly desktop environment.
  • Weaknesses: More conservative software updates, fewer customization options compared to Archbang, smaller community.


Archbang and Bunsenlabs offer unique takes on lightweight and efficient Linux computing. Archbang’s rolling release model and extensive customization options appeal to users who value the latest software and the ability to tailor their systems to their specific needs. Bunsenlabs, on the other hand, provides a stable and user-friendly experience with a curated package selection and a more polished desktop environment. The choice between Archbang and Bunsenlabs ultimately depends on individual preferences and priorities. Users seeking bleeding-edge software and in-depth customization capabilities may prefer Archbang, while those prioritizing stability and ease of use may find Bunsenlabs more suitable.

Keyword Phrase Tags:

  • Lightweight Linux Distros
  • Archbang Vs. Bunsenlabs
  • Openbox Window Manager
  • Rolling Release vs. Stable Debian
  • Minimalist Linux
Share this article
Shareable URL
Prev Post

Parabola Gnu/linux-libre Vs. Hyperbola Gnu/linux-libre: Free Software Commitment

Next Post

Qubes Os Vs. Tails: Security And Anonymity Compared

Comments 9
  1. I Think Its Kinda No Fair! Both Suck big ole armpits. Can’t Believe So Many People Would Be Fooled By Such Crummy, No Good, Distros.

  2. A Great Article About Two of the most importent Things, Distros. Have you ever write something about another Distros like Majaro or Fedora?

Dodaj komentarz

Twój adres e-mail nie zostanie opublikowany. Wymagane pola są oznaczone *

Read next