Arch Linux vs. Manjaro: A Battle for Flexibility and Ease of Use
Arch Linux and Manjaro are two popular Linux distributions that cater to different types of users. Arch Linux is a bleeding-edge distribution that provides users with the latest and greatest software, while Manjaro is a more user-friendly distribution that makes it easy for users to get started with Linux.
Arch Linux
Arch Linux is a rolling release distribution, which means that it is constantly updated with the latest software. This makes it a great choice for users who want to stay on the cutting edge of Linux development. However, Arch Linux can be more difficult to install and configure than other distributions, and it is not suitable for users who are new to Linux.
Manjaro
Manjaro is a user-friendly distribution that is based on Arch Linux. It includes a number of features that make it easy for users to get started with Linux, such as a graphical installer, a pre-configured desktop environment, and a package manager that makes it easy to install software. Manjaro is also more stable than Arch Linux, and it is a good choice for users who are new to Linux or who want a distribution that is easy to use.
Comparison
The following table compares Arch Linux and Manjaro:
| Feature | Arch Linux | Manjaro |
|---|---|---|
| Release model | Rolling release | Stable release |
| Installation difficulty | Difficult | Easy |
| Desktop environment | None (by default) | Pre-configured |
| Package manager | Pacman | Pacman |
| Stability | Less stable | More stable |
| Suitability for beginners | Not suitable | Suitable |
Conclusion
Arch Linux and Manjaro are both excellent Linux distributions. Arch Linux is a great choice for users who want to stay on the cutting edge of Linux development, while Manjaro is a good choice for users who are new to Linux or who want a distribution that is easy to use.
I tried Manjaro first, and after 6 months went to Arch. Manjaro had the upper hand on “ease of use” but the constant problems and surprises, like kernel updates breaking grub, or system maintenance scripts making weird actions, made me go to Arch. I’d rather deal with complexity and transparency than with mysterious failures that make me waste time seeking for an unknown reason to fix something.
I think that the writer did not mention one important point. These two distros are designed for different purposes. If you appreciate the art of having to google every command, the privilege of spending years to learn how to use it, and having the flexibility of doing everything you want breaking at any moment, then you will probably prefer Arch. Whereas, Manjaro is for those filthy casuals who want to have a working system ready to use just after the installation.
I’ve been using Arch for years and I’ve never had any problems. The commenters here are just haters who probably don’t know how to use Linux and are complaining about Arch because they can’t figure it out.
What a great article! I learned a lot about Arch Linux and Manjaro. I think I’m going to try out Manjaro first to see if I like it.
I’ve tried both Arch and Manjaro and I have to say that I prefer Manjaro. It’s more user-friendly and I’ve had fewer problems with it.
I’m a new Linux user and I’m not sure which distro to choose. I’ve been reading about Arch and Manjaro and I’m still not sure which one to try. Can anyone give me some advice?
I’ve been using Arch for a few years now and I love it. It’s the best distro out there.
I’ve tried both Arch and Manjaro and I have to say that I prefer Arch. It gives you more freedom and control over your system. Although for beginners Manjaro is probably a better choice, I will never say that it’s a better system.
Arch is the best distro. No more comments.